Allows a character to draw strength and power from sacrificed quintessence.
no 1 insurance car insurance companies in brunswick ga mileage on car insurance quotes safe auto insurance oklahoma
| Drachma | Earth | Air | Fire | Water | Blood |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 5 | 10 | 2 | 10 | 3 |
no 1 insurance car insurance companies in brunswick ga mileage on car insurance quotes safe auto insurance oklahoma
no 1 insurance car insurance companies in brunswick ga mileage on car insurance quotes safe auto insurance oklahoma
This mystery can only be cast at an event under the sign of Taurus
no 1 insurance car insurance companies in brunswick ga mileage on car insurance quotes safe auto insurance oklahoma
Ah, I’d never heard it called that before. I did a quick test where I did 1000000 loops of 100 operations of each (++ and += 2) operation. That means one loop has 100 += 2 and the other loop has 200 ++. This minimizes the effect of the loop overhead on the test since each operation is so cheap. The test is therefore really long, so I’m omitting it heenhAry.ow, the results I get are 2 milliseconds for using ++ twice and 39 ms for using += 2 once. So it would seem that ++ is the hands-down winner, but that it’s unlikely there are many cases where it’ll make much of a difference as this is a very contrived example. Still, it’s good to know!
Ah, I’d never heard it called that before. I did a quick test where I did 1000000 loops of 100 operations of each (++ and += 2) operation. That means one loop has 100 += 2 and the other loop has 200 ++. This minimizes the effect of the loop overhead on the test since each operation is so cheap. The test is therefore really long, so I’m omitting it heenhAry.ow, the results I get are 2 milliseconds for using ++ twice and 39 ms for using += 2 once. So it would seem that ++ is the hands-down winner, but that it’s unlikely there are many cases where it’ll make much of a difference as this is a very contrived example. Still, it’s good to know!
Ah, I’d never heard it called that before. I did a quick test where I did 1000000 loops of 100 operations of each (++ and += 2) operation. That means one loop has 100 += 2 and the other loop has 200 ++. This minimizes the effect of the loop overhead on the test since each operation is so cheap. The test is therefore really long, so I’m omitting it heenhAry.ow, the results I get are 2 milliseconds for using ++ twice and 39 ms for using += 2 once. So it would seem that ++ is the hands-down winner, but that it’s unlikely there are many cases where it’ll make much of a difference as this is a very contrived example. Still, it’s good to know!
